Explaining the context

On the internet I found an example of a scheme described like this:

Account (num-account, descr-account, launch (NUM-lanc, typelanc, data-lanc, value-lanc)).

Notice that the way this scheme is, it is not normalized.

Now consider the following criteria:

1. A counts and launch are groups of occurrence of the attributes in parentheses and to them juxtaposed;

2. Underlined attributes are identifiers of the relationship to which they belong;

3. num-lanc is dependent on num-conta, that is, in addition to num-lanc, it is necessary num-conta to identify a specific release;

4. No it is necessary to save history, that is, the emergence of a pair in a-account and a-lanc equal to one already registered, replaces the registry.

Visto os critérios, agora devemos normalizar o esquema até a 3FN.

A possible alternative

Account (num-account, descr-account) and launch(numconta, NUM-lanc, data-lanc, value-lanc).

Doubt

Would the above example be normalized to 3FN?