Question about the GPL 2 + license
I want instructions. Step-by-step and unambiguous :)
Locally, there was a discussion, but everyone came to the conclusion that the GPL is ambiguously understood.
Total, dry squeeze. There is a utility that is distributed under the GPL. On its basis, a library was made, exclusively for personal use. If you want to publish this library publicly, what should you do?
Synopsis: some files were left unchanged, some modified (some-almost to unrecognizability, except that something remains at the level of function prototypes), others have been added.
4
1 answers
You also need to distribute under the GPL version 2+. Short by steps:
- Place the header required by the license in each file.
- Do not forget to also specify all the copyright holders in the header.
- Attach the license text to the library.
Useful links:
- How to use GNU licenses with your programs
- License for your open-source project
- Practical guide to compliance GPL
- Answers to questions about GNU licenses
- GNU GPL 3 in human language
- World of Licenses: dealing with the GNU GPL
- How does GPLv3 fit in with other GNU licenses => http://копилефт.rf / licenses/gnu-gpl / compatibility-gnu-licenses (alas, a link to such an address is not created)
3
Author: Vladimir, 2015-05-08 18:08:46